Chanhassen
Villager
Villager
Shakopee
Valley News
Valley News
Victoria
Town Square
Town Square
Chaska
Residents Guide
Residents Guide
Coupons
Savvy.mn
Let's Go!
Scoreboard

By Mollee Francisco
The Chaska City Council voted unanimously to adopt a maximum tax levy for 2011 identical to that of 2010.
City staff has argued that to provide the same services, Chaska will need to collect the same taxes in 2011 as in 2010. However, home values are down an average of 7.43 percent in Chaska, which will mean that the tax rate will increase.
For the average homeowner, City Administrator Matt Podhradsky estimates that their 2011 city taxes will look much like that of their 2010 tax bill, perhaps slightly lower. For a median value home ($200,000), city taxes will run $467 in 2011 compared to $473 in 2010. Without the tax rate increase, Podhradsky said the average homeowner would pay about $457 in 2011.
Monday night, the city levy was set at $4,880,354. The Chaska Economic Development Authority, which the city council operates, set the Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA) levy at $74,864 – also the same as 2010.
“I’m less concerned about next year and more concerned about five years from now,” said City Administrator Matt Podhradsky.
The city faces a budget deficit of more than a half million dollars for 2011. Raising the tax rate – the percentage a homeowner pays based on the value of their residence – from .2189 to .2335, an increase of 6.7 percent, will make up for about $300,000 of that gap. Deferments are planned to make up for most of the remainder.
Podhradsky said without the rate hike, city staff would be forced to look at what services would be cut.
City treasurer Noel Graczyk warned the council that without the rate increase, “any regression would create a five-year climb-out” for Chaska.
The measure passed relatively quickly with no residents in the council chambers to voice their opposition and little discussion among the council members, who have spent two previous work sessions looking at the budget and their options for balancing it.
Councilor Gino Businaro defended his vote in favor of the rate hike saying that they “needed to start somewhere [considering] the difficulty in the 2011 budget,” but also noting that he understood the hardship it was creating for those residents already strapped due to loss of jobs, foreclosures or those on a fixed income.
“It’s difficult to pay a tax when you have no choice,” he said.
Businaro encouraged city staff to look long and hard at any possibilities to decrease expenditures or find additional revenue streams before the council was forced to set the final levy in December.
“Any help is appreciated,” he said.
Now that the maximum tax levy has been set, it can be lowered, but it cannot be increased for 2011. The public Truth in Taxation meeting will be held on Dec. 6. The council will adopt the final budget and tax levy on Dec. 20.

Let's check the math...
Back to page topLet's check the math here.
Median Home Price (2010): $216,216. Tax on the median home at the 0.2189 rate: $473.
Median Home Price (2011): $200,216. Tax on the median home at the 0.2189 rate is actually $438 -- not the $457 reported in the story above.
So the median homeowner is getting a $6 reduction in their taxes instead of a $35 reduction in taxes if this is adopted as the final levy.
Seano, I've asked Matt...
Back to page topSeano, I've asked Matt Podhradsky to get back to me with how they arrive at the $457 figure so that we can clarify or run a correction, if necessary.
(Mollee Francisco is a staff writer for the Chaska Herald. She can be reached at [email protected].)
Here is the response I got...
Back to page topHere is the response I got back from Matt Podhradsky:
"To answer your question, $457 is not the correct figure if the tax rate were to stay the same, and if we assumed a $200,216. The correct figure would be $438. If the tax levy stays the same, that is where they see the $6 decrease from what they are paying this year, to make it $467. In either scenario, the actual tax bill that the resident would see would be less than what they are currently paying this year, while still receiving the same amount of service."
(Mollee Francisco is a staff writer for the Chaska Herald. She can be reached at [email protected].)
I think it would be useful...
Back to page topI think it would be useful to have that clarified. If the tax rate were left the same, the median household would see a decrease of $35, not the $16 decrease implied by the $457 number. People need to see the correct math.
We will be printing a...
Back to page topWe will be printing a correction in next week's paper.
(Mollee Francisco is a staff writer for the Chaska Herald. She can be reached at [email protected].)
Why is it so difficult to...
Back to page topWhy is it so difficult to find services to cut?
Here are a few ideas:
How about cutting out the waste time & energy in mowing the acres and acres of parkland that nobody uses. True, some areas get used but the vast majority gets mowed w/o any use,so why mow it all?
Run city vehicles a couple years longer. Many I see all look pretty new.
Quit or lower the subsidies to SWTransit and Raise the rates to cover the costs. Users should be willing and capable of paying for it just like I pay for my transportation/commuting to work. No routes available for my commute, Either that or offer more routes for the rest of us.
More to come later!
This is a great topic - let...
Back to page topThis is a great topic - let the suggestions flow
No wage increses for anyone in the city in 2010.
Roll back the wages to Jan 1, 2009 like the rest of us.
Provide no financial support to Athletic Park
No plant baskets and daily watering for downtown.
Cut the police force by 10% - it will not be noticed and will probably improve service
Contract all police services with the County
quit speanding money on downtown -
Why are we building more parks?
Mollie or Mark- It appears...
Back to page topMollie or Mark-
It appears $4,880,354 is the amount of the maximum tax levy for 2011. What was the tax levy in 2010?
thx.