Lt. Gov./MnDOT Commissioner Carol Molnau has been in the line of fire ever since the I-35 bridge collapse.
However, long before serving a dual role as lieutenant governor and as head of Minnesota’s transportation department, she was a Chaska city councilor.
Molnau and her husband, Steve, lived on a 40-acre farm (now the site of a soccer field and townhouse development) next to Chaska High School along Pioneer Trail.
She served as a councilor from 1989 to 1992. She then represented Chaska in District 35A in the Minnesota House of Representatives, where she served as chair of the Transportation Finance Committee.
Then, in 2002, Tim Pawlenty chose her as his running mate, stating that she would be a “one-woman road and bridge SWAT team” and spend her first six months finding ways to speed up road projects and construction.
After the ticket was elected, Molnau said the SWAT team comment was a “little strong,” adding, “No matter where you go in government, there are areas where we need to improve. MnDOT is no different.”
When Pawlenty announced that Molnau would also serve as transportation commissioner, she had this to say: “Going into a whole new agency and (restructuring it) is a monumental task. … I think we’re going to look at the way the administration is set up and make sure it’s the most effective, to get to a team approach rather than an individual approach. So we’re going to be looking for more accountability, Molnau said.
Five years later, Molnau is now being regularly taken to task for her work with MnDOT.
What do you think? Are the criticisms valid? Is Molnau becoming a transportation scapegoat? Post your thoughts.


Molnau deserves every bit of...
Back to page topMolnau deserves every bit of criticism she is receiving. Even the most inept folks can hold down jobs they shouldn't because they surround themselves with great minds. The opposite seems true with Molnau and MNDOT. The waste and wrongdoing being unciovered at MNDOT is appalling with people travelling the globe on our dime under the cover of phony overseas business. As for her fast-tracking of highway projects, that was nothing more than essentially putting those projects on a credit card of sorts. Her accountability statement is interesting -- if you can't achieve that task in five years, when can you get that job done?
It's hilarious all this...
Back to page topIt's hilarious all this whining about Carol Molnau. Before she took the job, MN had a spartan 1960s road system, thanks to the Take-the-Bus liberals. Now we've finally added lanes to 494 and built 312 and entered the 1980s. Not bad considering the DFL neanderthals she's up against in the legislature.
Transportation funds should go towards building roads. She understands this. Partisan leftists with nefarious agendas hate that philosophy.
In this wintry season I just sing, "Let 'em Whine, Let 'em Whine, Let 'em Whine!"
THe I35 bridge collapse...
Back to page topTHe I35 bridge collapse notwithstanding, I will name projects that have been completed or startedduring her administration.
494 expansion from Hwy 100 to Hwy 394 - complete.
Hwy 312 in Carver/Hennepin Counties - nearly complete
494/US61 interchange in Wakota - nearly complete
New 35E bridge over the Mississippi at St Paul - complete
Reconstruct of 35W/MN62 commons - begun
Reconstruct of 35E/694 commons - nearly complete
Rebuild of I35 between Lakeville and Northfield - complete
...and those are just in the metro area. I can name more if you like.
This administration has done more road building that any other administration since the 1950s and with a continuing erosion of funds. Regardless of the consitution, there is gas tax money that gets diverted to the general fund - I know this because my father served in the Legislature for 14 years until 2006 and my uncle served for 14 years prior to that. Now we have this 'transportation amendment' which will divert even more money from road and bridge building and in to 'transit'.
Yes, the I35W bridge collapse was an absolute tragedy. However, I fail to see how increased taxes would have prevented it or how Molnau is at fault - the bridge had been listed in bad condition going back to the Perpich administration. Our problem is we have priority problems with how our transportation dollars are spent which forces the administration to borrow the money with bonds so that the money is 100% dedicated to road and bridge projects. Without the bonding we are at the whim of the legislature to dole out the funds and they are more privy to do light rail and commuter rail over fixing roads and bridges.
Besides that, you have that NSP dial watcher from Red Wing - Sen Steve Murphy - who thinks he's a transportation whiz because he's the committee chairman in the Senate. His job at NSP in Red Wing - watch the dials and if they do beyond a certain level, call someone. Nice. He's nothing more than Homer Simpson and about as smart (I know him personally - I used to live in Hastings where he represented for 10 years and met the man countless times) and his solution is just raise taxes. Well, couple that with the amendment and that won't make one bit of difference to fixing our roads and bridges.
I am sure we will find out that an unforeseen calamity brought down the bridge. Not Carol Molnau - she's done a good job as far as I am concerned.
Sure there have been many...
Back to page topSure there have been many road projects that have completed since the election of the Pawlenty/Molnau administration, but there have certainly been disappointments as well. Has Carol Molnau been dumped on, I think the answer to that is yes and I think some (but not all) of it is deserved. Her abrasiveness and lack of tact and transparency have not served her well, especially since her position requires her to be able to work with people of differing opinions and desires.
I’m not going to get into whether the decisions made by Molnau have benefited us or is she is the appropriate person in the commissioner’s seat; rather I would like to provide a balanced look at what has been stated by readers so far.
First a bit of history, MNDoT was created in 1976. Much of the four lane road building that occurred prior to that time was a result of the federal government's desire to work with states in the late 50's to build an interstate highway system modeled after the German Autobahn (given the state of our roads around the country, I would say that we haven’t come close to this yet.)
As for many of the recent completed and started road projects that patrick_dempsey calls attention to in his post, most of those projects were on the books for design and build well before the Pawlenty/Molnau administration. MNDoT regularly builds a 10 or 20 year plan to accomplish the transpiration goals of the state. For example we are currently working within a transportation plan built for the years 2004-2013.
Funding for roads AND transit in this state is pitiful compared to other states of comparable population and wealth. While I certainly believe I pay enough taxes already, I would be supportive of paying additional gas tax or license tab fees to increase funding for roads AND transit - provided the funds would be used only for these purposes.
Regardless of whether we drive or ride, there will be costs associated with the upkeep and operation of roads and transit. Funds must be available to build and keep the roads in good shape and to perform preventative maintenance and reconstruction, and to build and operate transit alternatives as well.
Whether GOP or DFL administrators are in the leadership positions in the state or at MNDoT, there needs to be an effort to spend our funds for roads AND transit so we have a future transportation system that will efficiently and cost-effectively move people (with choices of either road OR transit) around the metro and state.