Motorbuys | Local Jobs | Homes | Rental Property | Coupons | Garage Sales| Classifieds | Worship | ShopNow
May 15, 2008, 10:11 pm
Send your favorite photo to  snapshots at Chaska Herald
Welcome to the new chaskaherald.com, the home page of the Chaska Herald newspaper. Let us know what you think of the changes to the site.
Got a news tip? Email us, or call us at (952) 448-2650

User login

Latest poll

Would Gov. Pawlenty make a good Vice President?


Email Edition
Type in your email address and click "Subscribe" to receive our E-mail Edition in your inbox.




Add our RSS feed to your favorite service.

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL

Get Firefox

Jumping the tracks? The future of the downtown Chaska rail line is up in the air



No votes yet

By Mollee Francisco 

Nine months after a railroad trestle near Carver went tumbling into the Minnesota River, taking several railcars with it, Union Pacific is now looking at abandoning its line.

“We will be placing the line on our map for consideration in the future for abandonment,” confirmed Mark Davis, a media representative with Union Pacific.

High flood waters are still believed to have contributed to the trestle’s demise back in March. The collapse occurred less than a mile southeast of downtown Carver, rendering the line unusable.

According to Chaska City Administrator David Pokorney, Union Pacific based its decision to pursue abandonment on the high cost of reconstruction ($20 million to $25 million) as well as the fact that it had only one Chaska rail customer, United Sugars, at the time the trestle collapsed.

Pokorney has already made no bones about what a boon the abandonment could be for Chaska. The city would look to pick up railroad right-of-way, possibly preserving it for a future trail corridor, Pokorney said. It would also try to pick up key pieces in downtown, previously splintered by the rail line, for possible redevelopment.

Monday night, the Chaska council directed staff to execute a joint powers agreement with Carver, the Metropolitan Council and Scott and Carver counties. The agreement will be back before the council for final approval at its Jan. 28 meeting, but essentially would give the group the first chance to buy up right-of-way along the line.

However, while Chaska officials see opportunity in rail abandonment, Carver officials see big challenges.

Concerns in Carver

The Carver City Council had the abandonment on its agenda Monday night. City Administrator Jim Elmquist and City Planner Cindy Olness expected two issues to come up in relation to the railroad – namely how abandonment could affect the levee and the railroad bridge.

“The rail line serves as part of our ******,” explained Elmquist, of the portion of rail that extends from downtown Carver to the city’s depot park.

“We may not own all of our levee when it’s done,” said Olness, adding that the railroad owns pieces of the levee, and has easements along some sections. “We want to make sure the city has control over the levee.”

Also of concern will be river maintenance near the railroad bridge, just east of the downtown.

“Right now the (Union Pacific) clears out the log jams,” said Olness.

“The railroad has the capital and employee power to remove the logs and branches,” said Elmquist. “It would almost be an impossible task for a city to do from the shore.”

Despite the hardship that clearing log jams would present for Carver, no one is talking about tearing down the bridge, Olness said. Instead, Scott and Carver counties, along with the cities of Chaska and Carver, are seeking ways to preserve the corridor, in the face of possible abandonment.

“There are a bunch of uses for the corridor, all of which make a lot of sense,” said Olness.

In addition to a trail connecting Carver and Scott counties, the Metropolitan Council is reportedly interested in purchasing the corridor stretching from Athletic Park in Chaska to Carver’s depot park to extend a sewer line. A trail could also be constructed above the line, providing a link between Carver and Chaska’s downtowns.

United Sugars to protest

The last nine months have been full of question marks for the rail line’s sole customer, United Sugars. The sugar factory, located at the end of the line, just south of Stoughton Avenue, was receiving regular shipments of sugar from the Red River Valley before the bridge collapsed.

“It certainly has had a lingering effect on employee’s minds,” said Ray Smith, facilities and quality systems director with United Sugars.

The company is aware of Union Pacific’s intention to abandon the rail line and plans to “protest vigorously,” Smith said. It will ultimately be up to the state of Minnesota to decide the line’s fate, however. Meanwhile, United Sugars employees have worked to keep busy amid the logistic problems the collapse has created.

Initially, the factory relied on its stores of sugar to continue operations, but eventually, the company began trucking in sugar. That has required a lot more planning on the transportation side, Smith said.

“To be the most efficient, we need to be able to ship by rail,” he said.

Smith explained that their Chaska plant is equipped to load rail cars, not trucks. “Basically, you just dump it into a rail car,” he said.

Filling trucks takes longer, Smith said, and the trucks don’t carry as much as a rail car. “One rail car equals about four trucks,” he said.

Before the railroad trestle collapse, United Sugars was dividing its time up between shipping bulk granulated sugar and producing liquid sugar. Since the collapse, the factory has had to drop the bulk shipping and focus on liquid sugar production.

“We have very limited liquid sugar capacity, though,” said Smith. “So we’ve basically been doing made to order.”

Meanwhile, United Sugars has been looking at their options should the line be abandoned for good.

“Since March, we’ve been working on a number of alternatives,” said Smith, adding that they felt it was important to do everything possible to keep the Chaska facility operational.

“We’ve very interested in keeping Chaska open,” said Smith. “We have to have the ability to deliver to our customers in the area and we’ve got a lot of loyal employees there.”


Jonathon Transload...

Back to page top

Jonathon Transload Facility

I thought the city was going to offer the Twin Cities & Western money to build a transload facility in Jonathon to help United Sugars get their beet shipments via rail. What happened to that plan? I've driven up and around the TC&W line between Chaska and Chanhassen and there is no transload facility and not even a reliable place to build such a facility.

The trestle that collapsed actually burned in a brush fire in 1950 when the Minneapolis & St Louis Railway ran the line. Unfortunately, when CN&W bought out M&StL in 1960, they asked many of their customers to move to the south side of the river to the old Omaha Road mainline through Shakopee so that CN&W could abandon the M&StL line from Chaska to Mpls - which CN&W did in 1991. Another crucial mistake by a myopic railroad.

One idea I have is to allow TC&W to build a connection from Cologne along the former Milwaukee Road right-of-way along the south side of 212 to Chaska so that United Sugars can continue operating and Chaska can still hear an occasional train horn in downtown...but, I know that will never happen.

I think United Sugars is screwed. But, I hope UP rebuilds.

In 1868, the Hastings & Dakota - one of the forerunners of the Milwaukee Road in MN - built their line through town (with the M&StL coming in 1870) beginning 140 years of railroading in downtown Chaska. Sadly, I think that era will soon come to a close for Chaska and railroading in downtown Chaska will be gone forever. To think, two Class I railroads used to pass through town on a regular basis. Now, most likely, the trainhorns and love affair many of us have had with railroads will come to a close in our fair city. Sad indeed.


Submitted by patrick_dempsey on January 12, 2008 - 12:34am.

In this day of environmental...

Back to page top

In this day of environmental impact statements why doesn't the city of Chaska need to get an environmental impact statement before pushing the abandonment of the rail line leading the United Sugars. Each train car holds 4 semi loads of sugar. 10 cars are brought sometimes 3 times a week in most times during the year. For those who hate pollution maybe you can do the mathamatics to figure out how much pollution the abandonment will cause not to mention the additional semi traffic through the city of Chaska. With the cost of oil increasing it also increases the use of diesel fuel for these additional trucks.

Mike Lehne


Submitted by railroad169 on January 15, 2008 - 7:41pm.