<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.chaskaherald.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Chaska Herald - Elections 2008: Should Florida and Michigan get do-overs? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.chaskaherald.com/community/forums/federal-government/elections-2008-should-florida-and-michigan-get-do-overs</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Elections 2008: Should Florida and Michigan get do-overs?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Elections 2008: Should Florida and Michigan get do-overs?</title>
 <link>http://www.chaskaherald.com/community/forums/federal-government/elections-2008-should-florida-and-michigan-get-do-overs</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Florida has recently proposed a plan to re-do its democratic primary election after its votes were nullified when it moved up its contests against Democratic National Convention rules. (Michigan suffered the same fate)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Ballots would be cast via in-person and mail-in votes with the primary being held on June 3. The proposal would be sent to the DNC in mid-April following a fundraising and comment period. A re-do is expected to cost between $10 and $12 million.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chaskaherald.com/community/forums/federal-government/elections-2008-should-florida-and-michigan-get-do-overs&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.chaskaherald.com/community/forums/federal-government/elections-2008-should-florida-and-michigan-get-do-overs#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.chaskaherald.com/community/forums/federal-government">Federal Government</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:41:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mollee Francisco</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3884 at http://www.chaskaherald.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
