This is the e-mail I sent to

Citizen — Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:07:02 -0500

This is the e-mail I sent to the Carver County Attorny:
Notice: It seems Officials in the jurisdiction of Carver County are proposing the Social Host ordinance that may become a conspiracy to commit a crime under color of the law and put the City, County, and official open to criminal prosecution and civil suit. Here is what strikes me on an elementary level as a Citizen of the State of Minnesota. City ordinance seems to violate Mn. Rules, unlawfully Mixes Criminal and Civil law usurping Mn. State Legislature Jurisdiction. The Ordinance requires under threat of coercion that A host individual must obtain age information from other individuals and therefore The City Must follow Mn. Data Practices act and procedure of the Tenneson Notice including if this is mandatory or voluntary and if they do not do this the City and officers making citation are committing a misdemeanor violating the MGDPA Section13.04(Subd.3.) of Mn. Statute One floating around Case Law:
CITY OF DALLAS et al. v. MITCHELL 245 S.W. 944
"The rights of the individual are not derived from governmental agencies,
either municipal, state, federal, or even from the Constitution, but they exist inherently in every man, and are merely reaffirmed in the Constitution and restricted only to the extent they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government."
In order to enforce the ordinance???s provisions, the zoning ordinance must incorporate the building code. See State ex rel. Utick v. Bd. of Comm???rs of Polk County, 87 Minn. 325, 341, 92 N.W.2d 216, 220 (1902)

Concerned Citizen with the open corruption in government, Citizen Gomez

City is first in state to pass Social Host Ordinance

Mollee Francisco — Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:34:20 -0500

By Mollee Francisco

Chaska Herald - City is first in state to pass Social Host Ordinance - Comments

This is the e-mail I sent to

City is first in state to pass Social Host Ordinance