In the close 2000 Presidential race between Gore and Bush, many Democrats blamed Ralph Nader for throwing the election to the Republicans. Hanging chads and other voting anomalies aside, Nader’s Green Party collection of 2.74% of the vote was seen as a slap in the face to millions of Democrats who wanted a government that would represent their views.
Those Americans ended up getting George W. Bush by the thinnest of all margins. Adding insult to injury, Bush did not win the popular vote, and ran to the U.S. Supreme Court for relief against a recount that Florida’s own Supreme Court deemed proper. While Bush’s political cronies did their best to make Gore seem like a sore loser for daring to challenge a close and problem-riddled count, many Americans instead focused on the 2.74% of the vote that was “wasted” on Nader, who didn’t have any real chance of winning the election, never mind ever being any sort of valid contender.
Now we have Barack Hussein Obama.
It is politically incorrect — probably even politically suicidal — to mention the obvious in a climate where the slightest hint of an offense turns into a month of volleying soundbytes, but I am not a politician, and I’m not particularly good at pretending reality doesn’t exist, so let me say what many millions of other Americans are no doubt thinking: Obama doesn’t stand a chance in hell of becoming our next President.
You can read the rest of this entry at http://janedevin.com


Or is Barack the next H....
Back to page topOr is Barack the next H. Ross Perot, who handed us the Clintons?
'Nader' might be a bit of a lofty tag to hang on Obama, as the Democratic party nominating convention is months away, and the primaries and cauci winners seem very up for grabs.
Barack has a very good chance in Hell at the presidency. There was Hillary, Obama and four guys who seem to have no shot at the nomination at the latest Democratic debate in Iowa. Without the presence as yet of a strong third-party candidate or a clear front-running Republican candidate, the Dem nominee has at worst a 1-in-2 shot at the Oval Office.
The only way for Obama to be a Nader or Perot, as I see it: He loses the nomination, and runs for President on an independent ticket. Either way, I bet he gets more than 2.74 percent of the popular vote.
I agree that Obama has a...
Back to page topI agree that Obama has a very good chance of getting the Democratic nomination and with that being elected president (middle name included).
The thing I hear most often is something to the tune of "I like him, but I don't think *other* people would vote for him" - and I hear this from quite a few people. If all of those who wanted to vote for him stand tall in their decision and do, I think he's got a very real shot at being our next President.
If people falter and vote for someone else because they're worried of what *other* people think, then we're just setting ourselves up to be disapointed in the results.